The National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) is a tough national-level entrance exam for getting into undergraduate medical and dental programs in India. Every year, lakhs of students compete for a limited number of seats in top medical colleges.
In 2024, the NEET UG results were announced on June 4th. This year, a record-breaking 67 students achieved the top rank, each scoring a perfect 720 out of 720 marks. This unusually high number of toppers has raised concerns about the fairness and transparency of the NEET 2024 exam process.
Many students and parents are worried about securing admission to their preferred medical colleges due to the high cut-off scores. Suspicion has arisen particularly around a center in Haryana, where 8 of the 67 top-scoring students come from, suggesting possible NEET 2024 malpractice or irregularities during the exam. This has led to discussions about potential NEET exam fraud and the need for a NEET fraud investigation to ensure the integrity of the exam.
The recent NEET UG 2024 results have raised concerns about cheating and unfair advantages at some centers in Haryana, especially in Jhajjar. The controversy started when 8 students from one or two centers in Haryana scored a perfect 720, which many find suspicious and have led to allegations of a NEET scam.
Reports of a student receiving a different paper code have questioned the fairness and normalization procedures used by the National Testing Agency (NTA). The NTA explained that the high scores are due to changes in NCERT textbooks and grace marks for lost exam time. However, many students, parents, and political parties are unhappy and demand an investigation into the NEET exam scam.
These concerns are not new for Haryana. In the past, there have been instances of exam malpractice and corruption. For example, in 2018, 29 people were arrested for cheating in the Group C examination, and in 2021, the Haryana Chief Minister dismissed allegations of cheating in the recruitment process by the Haryana Public Service Commission (HPSC).
The NEET 2024 controversy has further fueled these concerns. The unusually high number of perfect scores, with 67 students sharing the top rank, has led to more speculation about unfair advantages and NEET 2024 irregularities at certain centers. While the NTA defends the results, many are skeptical about the exam’s integrity and the normalization procedures used.
This controversy also highlights the need for stricter regulations in the coaching industry. The Haryana government has introduced a new Act to regulate private coaching institutes, aiming to prevent malpractice and reduce the stress on students. The Act requires coaching institutes to disclose their fee structure, the number of enrolled students, and proper infrastructure. Non-compliant institutes will face penalties.
In conclusion, the allegations of cheating in Haryana, especially in Jhajjar, have raised serious concerns about the integrity of the NEET UG 2024 exam. The improbability of 8 students scoring a perfect 720 from one or two centers has sparked widespread suspicion, and the normalization procedures used by the NTA are being questioned. Stricter regulations in the coaching industry and a thorough investigation into the allegations are essential to ensure fairness in future exams.
Here is the list of all 67 NEET 2024 AIR 1 who got 720 marks out of 720 marks and created the history.
S. No. | Roll Number | Candidate Name | Gender | Category | Percentile | NEET Rank | State |
1 | 3111020418 | Ved Sunilkumar Shende | Male | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Maharashtra |
2 | 4101140577 | Syed Aarifin Yusuf M | Male | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Tamil Nadu |
3 | 2001920176 | Mridul Manya Anand | Male | OBC – (NCL) as Per Central List | 99.997129 | 1 | Delhi |
4 | 4408010813 | Ayush Naugraiya | Male | Gen-Ews | 99.997129 | 1 | Uttar Pradesh |
5 | 1518070396 | Mazin Mansoor | Male | OBC – (NCL) as Per Central List | 99.997129 | 1 | Bihar |
6 | 4615020151 | Rupayan Mandal | Male | General | 99.997129 | 1 | West Bengal |
7 | 4502010089 | Akshat Pangaria | Male | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Uttarakhand |
8 | 3814040184 | Shaurya Goyal | Male | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Punjab |
9 | 1504020063 | Tathagat Awatar | Male | OBC – (NCL) as Per Central List | 99.997129 | 1 | Bihar |
10 | 4301010696 | Chand Mallik | Male | SC | 99.997129 | 1 | Tripura |
11 | 3918040017 | Prachita | Female | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Rajasthan |
12 | 4101170046 | Shailaja S | Female | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Tamil Nadu |
13 | 3923490143 | Saurav | Male | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Rajasthan |
14 | 3905130233 | Divyansh | Male | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Delhi |
15 | 3805040153 | Gunmay Garg | Male | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Punjab |
16 | 3925020112 | Aadarsh Singh Moyal | Male | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Rajasthan |
17 | 4101140043 | Aditya Kumar Panda | Male | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Tamil Nadu |
18 | 4608060714 | Arghyadeep Dutta | Male | OBC – (NCL) as Per Central List | 99.997129 | 1 | West Bengal |
19 | 4101070368 | Sriram P | Male | OBC – (NCL) as Per Central List | 99.997129 | 1 | Tamil Nadu |
20 | 3906010801 | Isha Kothari | Female | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Rajasthan |
21 | 1203040193 | Kasturi Sandeep Chowdary | Male | Gen-Ews | 99.997129 | 1 | Andhra Pradesh |
22 | 3903250400 | Shashank Sharma | Male | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Rajasthan |
23 | 3111200278 | Shubhan Sengupta | Male | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Maharashtra |
24 | 4609020112 | Saksham Agrawal | Male | General | 99.997129 | 1 | West Bengal |
25 | 3903190309 | Aryan Sharma | Male | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Himachal Pradesh |
26 | 3905270041 | Kahkasha Parween | Female | OBC – (NCL) as Per Central List | 99.997129 | 1 | Jharkhand |
27 | 2802020280 | Devadarshan R Nair | Male | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Kerala |
28 | 1205010353 | Gattu Bhanuteja Sai | Male | OBC – (NCL) as Per Central List | 99.997129 | 1 | Andhra Pradesh |
29 | 3110070584 | Umayma Malbari | Female | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Maharashtra |
30 | 2712160121 | Kalyan V | Male | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Karnataka |
31 | 4410120368 | Sujoy Dutta | Male | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Delhi |
32 | 3923440101 | Shyam Jhanwar | Male | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Rajasthan |
33 | 4408010212 | Aryan Yadav | Male | OBC – (NCL) as Per Central List | 99.997129 | 1 | Uttar Pradesh |
34 | 2603130439 | Manav Priyadarshi | Male | OBC – (NCL) as Per Central List | 99.997129 | 1 | Jharkhand |
35 | 3114070516 | Palansha Agarwal | Female | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Maharashtra |
36 | 4131040542 | Rajaneesh P | Male | SC | 99.997129 | 1 | Tamil Nadu |
37 | 3903270703 | Dhruv Garg | Male | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Rajasthan |
38 | 3102140346 | Krishnamurti Pankaj Shiwal | Male | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Maharashtra |
39 | 2807080262 | Sreenand Sharmil | Male | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Kerala |
40 | 2201060522 | Ved Patel | Male | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Gujarat |
41 | 2712150234 | Sam Shreyas Joseph | Male | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Karnataka |
42 | 4108080365 | Jayathi Poorvaja M | Female | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Tamil Nadu |
43 | 3112500239 | Mane Neha Kuldeep | Female | OBC – (NCL) as Per Central List | 99.997129 | 1 | Maharashtra |
44 | 1502450494 | Hritik Raj | Male | OBC – (NCL) as Per Central List | 99.997129 | 1 | Bihar |
45 | 2208040843 | Kriti Sharma | Female | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Gujarat |
46 | 3814060175 | Taijas Singh | Male | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Chandigarh |
47 | 2707150055 | Arjun Kishore | Male | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Karnataka |
48 | 4108010447 | Rohith R | Male | OBC – (NCL) as Per Central List | 99.997129 | 1 | Tamil Nadu |
49 | 2806021049 | Abhishek V J | Male | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Kerala |
50 | 4108060092 | Sabareesan S | Male | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Tamil Nadu |
51 | 2207011647 | Darsh Paghdar | Male | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Gujarat |
52 | 3802040224 | Shikhin Goyal | Male | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Punjab |
53 | 3110110328 | Amina Arif Kadiwala | Female | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Maharashtra |
54 | 3923460114 | Devesh Joshi | Male | Gen-Ews | 99.997129 | 1 | Rajasthan |
55 | 2201060423 | Rishabh Shah | Male | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Gujarat |
56 | 1205040181 | Poreddy Pavan Kumar Reddy | Male | Gen-Ews | 99.997129 | 1 | Andhra Pradesh |
57 | 2808260093 | Abhinav Sunil Prasad | Male | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Kerala |
58 | 3903010023 | Samit Kumar Saini | Male | OBC – (NCL) as Per Central List | 99.997129 | 1 | Rajasthan |
59 | 3903020440 | Iram Quazi | Female | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Rajasthan |
60 | 1205030857 | Vadlapudi Mukhesh Chowdary | Male | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Andhra Pradesh |
61 | 1531050005 | Abhinav Kisna | Male | OBC – (NCL) as Per Central List | 99.997129 | 1 | Bihar |
62 | 2307010168 | Khushboo | Female | Gen-Ews | 99.997129 | 1 | Haryana |
63 | 2307010333 | Krish | Male | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Haryana |
64 | 2307010403 | Lakshay | Male | OBC – (NCL) as Per Central List | 99.997129 | 1 | Delhi |
65 | 2307010460 | Anjali | Female | OBC – (NCL) as Per Central List | 99.997129 | 1 | Haryana |
66 | 2307010178 | Jahnvee | Female | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Rajasthan |
67 | 2307010037 | Prateek | Male | General | 99.997129 | 1 | Haryana |
The NEET UG 2024 results have sparked concerns about how the normalization process affects the exam’s fairness. Normalization is a method used to ensure all candidates are assessed equally, no matter how difficult their question paper was.
However, many students scoring 720 out of 720 marks, especially from certain centers in Haryana, have raised questions about the fairness of the normalization process. The National Testing Agency (NTA) says this is due to changes in NCERT textbooks and giving grace marks for lost exam time.
Despite the NTA’s explanations, there isn’t enough clear information about how normalization was applied in NEET 2024. Some key questions include:
Without clear answers, it’s hard for students and parents to judge if the process was fair and accurate.
The lack of transparency and the high number of perfect scores have raised concerns about the exam’s integrity and the future of medical education in India. If normalization isn’t done fairly, it could lead to:
These issues are serious because NEET is crucial for getting into medical colleges across the country. Concerns about NEET exam fraud, NEET 2024 malpractice, and other related issues need to be addressed to maintain trust in the system.
An FIR has been registered in Patna over allegations of a possible NEET paper leak. This case involves the suspected leakage of NEET UG 2024 question papers, causing widespread concern and confusion among students and parents. The FIR was filed after five people were arrested in connection with the leak, and investigations are ongoing to determine the extent of the incident.
Initially, authorities denied any leakage, only to later confirm that the papers were indeed leaked. This has led to a significant loss of confidence among students, who are already under immense pressure to perform well. The potential NEET exam fraud has raised serious questions about the integrity of the exam and whether the authorities can ensure a fair and transparent process.
A leak of this nature undermines the very foundation of the exam, which is meant to assess students’ academic abilities. If confirmed, the NEET cheating scandal could have far-reaching consequences, including the invalidation of exam results and the need for a re-examination. Moreover, it could lead to a loss of faith in the system, with long-term implications for the credibility of the exam and the institutions that rely on it. Check this to find out if there NEET 2024 paper leaked or not?
The NEET UG 2024 results have raised big concerns about possible cheating and unfair practices. Many are questioning the exam’s fairness because of the unusually high cut-offs and a surprising number of students scoring 720 out of 720 marks. The NTA says the high scores are due to changes in NCERT textbooks and extra marks given for lost examination time. However, the lack of transparency has caused mistrust among students.
It’s important for the NTA to explain clearly and ensure the exam is fair. They need to address these issues and take steps to restore confidence in the NEET UG examination process. Despite these challenges, students should stay hopeful and keep working towards their dreams. With hard work and support, they can overcome these obstacles and succeed.
The NEET 2024 controversy is about the high cut-offs and many students scoring 720 out of 720 marks. Many students and parents are questioning the results, citing irregularities and unfair practices.
The NTA NEET scam refers to the allegations of irregularities and unfair practices in the NEET 2024 exam. The NTA has denied any wrongdoing, attributing the high scores to changes in NCERT textbooks and grace marks.
The NTA gave grace marks to candidates who lost time during the exam. This was done to ensure fairness and not penalize candidates who faced delays.
The grace marks in NEET 2024 were given to candidates who lost time during the exam. These marks were awarded based on representations and court cases.
The NTA-NEET controversy is about the high cut-offs and many students scoring 720 out of 720 marks. Many students and parents are questioning the results, citing irregularities and unfair practices.