Assertion : Incomplete dominance is a deviation from law of dominance.Reason : In incomplete dominance, F1 generation did not resemble either of the two parents and was in between the two parents.

Assertion is true. Incomplete dominance is a deviation from the law of dominance. In classical Mendelian genetics, the law of dominance states that when two homozygous parents with contrasting traits are crossed (one dominant and one recessive), all the F1 offspring will exhibit the dominant trait. The recessive trait will only be observed in the F2 generation when the F1 individuals are crossed.Reason is true. In incomplete dominance, the F1 generation does not show the typical dominant and recessive phenotypes seen in classical Mendelian genetics. Instead, the F1 individuals display an intermediate phenotype, which is a blending of the phenotypes of the two parents. This blending occurs because neither allele is completely dominant over the other, leading to an intermediate expression of the trait in the heterozygous offspring.Both assertion and reason are true and reason is correct explanation of assertion.

Assertion : Incomplete dominance is a deviation from law of dominance.Reason : In incomplete dominance, F1 generation did not resemble either of the two parents and was in between the two parents.

Assertion is true. Incomplete dominance is a deviation from the law of dominance. In classical Mendelian genetics, the law of dominance states that when two homozygous parents with contrasting traits are crossed (one dominant and one recessive), all the F1 offspring will exhibit the dominant trait. The recessive trait will only be observed in the F2 generation when the F1 individuals are crossed.Reason is true. In incomplete dominance, the F1 generation does not show the typical dominant and recessive phenotypes seen in classical Mendelian genetics. Instead, the F1 individuals display an intermediate phenotype, which is a blending of the phenotypes of the two parents. This blending occurs because neither allele is completely dominant over the other, leading to an intermediate expression of the trait in the heterozygous offspring.Both assertion and reason are true and reason is correct explanation of assertion.

AI Mentor

Check Your IQ

Free Expert Demo

Try Test

Courses

Dropper NEET Course Dropper JEE Course Class - 12 NEET Course Class - 12 JEE Course Class - 11 NEET Course Class - 11 JEE Course Class - 10 Foundation NEET Course Class - 10 Foundation JEE Course Class - 10 CBSE Course Class - 9 Foundation NEET Course Class - 9 Foundation JEE Course Class -9 CBSE Course Class - 8 CBSE Course Class - 7 CBSE Course Class - 6 CBSE Course

Offline Centres

Assertion : Incomplete dominance is a deviation from law of dominance.
Reason : In incomplete dominance, F₁ generation did not resemble either of the two parents and was in between the two parents.

see full answer

Your Exam Success, Personally Taken Care Of

1:1 expert mentors customize learning to your strength and weaknesses – so you score higher in school , IIT JEE and NEET entrance exams.

An Intiative by Sri Chaitanya

Both Assertion and Reason are true and Reason is correct explanation of Assertion

Assertion is true, but Reason is false

Assertion is false, but Reason is true

Both Assertion and reason are true, but Reason is not the correct explanation of Assertion

answer is A.

(Unlock A.I Detailed Solution for FREE)

Best Courses for You

JEE

NEET

Foundation JEE

Foundation NEET

CBSE

Detailed Solution

Assertion is true. Incomplete dominance is a deviation from the law of dominance. In classical Mendelian genetics, the law of dominance states that when two homozygous parents with contrasting traits are crossed (one dominant and one recessive), all the F₁ offspring will exhibit the dominant trait. The recessive trait will only be observed in the F₂ generation when the F₁ individuals are crossed.

Reason is true. In incomplete dominance, the F₁ generation does not show the typical dominant and recessive phenotypes seen in classical Mendelian genetics. Instead, the F₁ individuals display an intermediate phenotype, which is a blending of the phenotypes of the two parents. This blending occurs because neither allele is completely dominant over the other, leading to an intermediate expression of the trait in the heterozygous offspring.

Both assertion and reason are true and reason is correct explanation of assertion.

Watch 3-min video & get full concept clarity