Choose whether the given statement is True/False:

In the Olga Tellis vs Bombay Municipal Corporation case, the judges said that the Right to Livelihood is not part of the Right to Life.

see full answer

Start JEE / NEET / Foundation preparation at rupees 99/day !!

21% of IItians & 23% of AIIMS delhi doctors are from Sri Chaitanya institute !!

An Intiative by Sri Chaitanya

True

False

answer is B.

(Unlock A.I Detailed Solution for FREE)

Ready to Test Your Skills?

Check your Performance Today with our Free Mock Test used by Toppers!

Take Free Test

Detailed Solution

The given statement is false. The judges in the case of Olga Tellis vs Bombay Municipal Corporation stated that the Right to Livelihood was part of the Right to Life. They stated that life is more than just an animal existence; it cannot be lived without a means of subsistence or "the means of livelihood." The judges agreed that eviction from a slum or pavement is a deprivation of means of livelihood for the poor who cannot afford to live elsewhere. They take on small jobs in the surrounding areas, and losing their pavement or slum means losing a job, which means losing a source of income. As a result, "life deprivation" occurs. This is how the judges linked the Right to Work to the Right to Life.
The correct statement is the judges in the case of Olga Tellis vs Bombay Municipal Corporation stated that the Right to Livelihood was part of the Right to Life.

Watch 3-min video & get full concept clarity

Result Producing online coaching for JEE/NEET of south India

Largest All India Test Series for JEE/NEET

Best Books for IIT JEE

Best Books for NEET

How to Join IIT after 10th