




















AI Mentor
Check Your IQ
Free Expert Demo
Try Test
Courses
Dropper NEET CourseDropper JEE CourseClass - 12 NEET CourseClass - 12 JEE CourseClass - 11 NEET CourseClass - 11 JEE CourseClass - 10 Foundation NEET CourseClass - 10 Foundation JEE CourseClass - 10 CBSE CourseClass - 9 Foundation NEET CourseClass - 9 Foundation JEE CourseClass -9 CBSE CourseClass - 8 CBSE CourseClass - 7 CBSE CourseClass - 6 CBSE Course
Offline Centres
Q.
Explain Mahalwari system.
see full answer
Your Exam Success, Personally Taken Care Of
1:1 expert mentors customize learning to your strength and weaknesses – so you score higher in school , IIT JEE and NEET entrance exams.
An Intiative by Sri Chaitanya
(Unlock A.I Detailed Solution for FREE)
Best Courses for You

JEE

NEET

Foundation JEE

Foundation NEET

CBSE
Detailed Solution
The Mahalwari System was a British land-revenue arrangement in which the village (mahal) or a group of villages was treated as a single unit responsible for paying land revenue collectively to the Company government.
When, where, and by whom
- Introduced: Basis laid by Holt Mackenzie (1822); system consolidated in the 1830s.
- Regions: North-Western Provinces (U.P.), later Punjab, parts of Central India and Awadh.
How it worked
- Village survey & measurement: Officials measured fields, mapped villages, and recorded soils, crops, and past yields.
- Assessment: They calculated a government share of the estimated produce/rent for the entire village (the mahal).
- Fixing demand (not permanent): Revenue demand was periodic/revisable (e.g., every 20–30 years), not fixed forever.
- Collective responsibility: The mahal—through its headman (lambardār) or council—collected dues from individual cultivators and paid the lump sum to the state.
- Intermediaries & records: Village officials (patwari/qanungo) kept registers of holdings, payments, and arrears.
Key features (exam-ready points)
- Unit of assessment: Village/mahal, not individual peasant alone.
- Collector/Headman: Lambardār acted as the main revenue collector for the mahal.
- Revision: Revenue was revisable, linked to fresh surveys/estimates.
- Community tie-in: Claimed to rely on existing village institutions, but the demand remained high.
Why the British used it
- They believed village communities could self-organize collection, lowering administrative costs.
- Periodic revision let the state raise demand when prices or output rose.
Impact on peasants
- Heavy, uncertain burden: Because the demand could be revised upward, peasants faced uncertainty.
- Collective pressure: If some could not pay, the whole mahal felt pressure—often leading to debt and distress sales.
- Control without relief: Even with “local institutions,” assessments frequently favoured revenue maximization over peasant welfare.
Quick compare (for revision)
| Feature | Mahalwari | Zamindari (Permanent) | Ryotwari |
| Unit | Village/mahal | Zamindar (landlord) | Individual ryot |
| Demand | Revisable (periodic) | Fixed permanently (1793) | Revisable |
| Collector | Lambardār / village body | Zamindar | State deals with ryot |
| Regions | NWP, Punjab, Awadh | Bengal, Bihar, Orissa | Madras, Bombay |
3 must-remember lines
- Mahalwari = Village unit + collective responsibility.
- Introduced in 1820s–30s (Holt Mackenzie) in North-Western Provinces; spread to Punjab/Awadh.
- Revenue not permanent; periodically revised → uncertainty and burdens for peasants.
Watch 3-min video & get full concept clarity


courses
No courses found
Ready to Test Your Skills?
Check your Performance Today with our Free Mock Test used by Toppers!
Take Free Test

