Courses

By rohit.pandey1
|
Updated on 8 Apr 2026, 15:22 IST
With the completion of JEE Main 2026 Session 2 (April attempt) on April 8, candidates are now actively comparing both sessions to understand their performance and final ranking prospects. Key questions being asked include — Which JEE Main 2026 session was easier? Does JEE Main Session 2 offer any advantage? Which score will NTA consider for ranking?
Since JEE Main is conducted across multiple shifts and sessions, factors such as difficulty level, normalization, and competition pool play a crucial role in determining the final outcome.
This article presents a detailed comparison of JEE Main 2026 Session 1 and Session 2, based on shift-wise analysis and student feedback. It covers overall difficulty trends, subject-wise insights, normalization process, Best of Two rule, marks vs percentile comparison, and strategic guidance to help candidates evaluate their attempt and plan their next steps effectively.
| Parameter | Session 1 (January) | Session 2 (April) |
| Exam Dates | January 21–28, 2026 | April 2–8, 2026 |
| Total Shifts (B.Tech) | 10 shifts | 9 shifts |
| Overall Difficulty | Moderate | Moderate (Session 2 slightly easier overall) |
| Toughest Shift | January 23, Shift 2 | April 6, Shift 1 |
| Easiest Shift | January 28, Shift 2 | April 4, Shift 1 |
| Toughest Subject (Both) | Mathematics | Mathematics |
| Most Scoring Subject (Both) | Chemistry | Chemistry |
| Result Declared | February 16, 2026 | Expected April 20–25, 2026 |
| Score Used for Rank | Best of Two (higher NTA percentile) | Best of Two (higher NTA percentile) |
| Total Candidates (approx.) | ~13 lakh | Higher than Session 1 |
Based on complete shift-wise student feedback and expert analysis across both sessions, Session 2 (April 2026) was generally easier than Session 1 (January 2026). Most Session 2 shifts maintained a moderate difficulty level, with Chemistry being consistently NCERT-based and Physics being more formula-driven than Session 1.
However, "easier" is not uniform across all shifts. April 6 Shift 1 — the toughest shift of Session 2 — was comparable to the harder Session 1 papers. Normalization ensures that students in tougher shifts are not penalised, so the comparison ultimately comes down to individual performance within a shift rather than across sessions.
Key findings from the complete data:
Session 2 was marginally easier overall, but the difference was not drastic enough to guarantee a higher raw score. Normalization neutralises shift-level difficulty variations, so the session you perform better in is the one that matters — not which one felt easier to the general pool.
| Exam Date & Shift | Session | Overall Difficulty | Toughest Section |
| Jan 21 Shift 1 | Session 1 | Easy to Moderate | Mathematics |
| Jan 21 Shift 2 | Session 1 | Moderate | Mathematics |
| Jan 22 Shift 1 | Session 1 | Moderate | Mathematics |
| Jan 22 Shift 2 | Session 1 | Moderate | Chemistry |
| Jan 23 Shift 1 | Session 1 | Moderate | Mathematics |
| Jan 23 Shift 2 | Session 1 | Moderate to Difficult (Toughest of Session 1) | Chemistry > Maths |
| Jan 24 Shift 1 | Session 1 | Moderate | Mathematics |
| Jan 24 Shift 2 | Session 1 | Moderate | Mathematics |
| Jan 28 Shift 1 | Session 1 | Moderate | Mathematics |
| Jan 28 Shift 2 | Session 1 | Easy to Moderate (Easiest of Session 1) | Mathematics |
| Apr 2 Shift 1 | Session 2 | Moderate | Mathematics |
| Apr 2 Shift 2 | Session 2 | Moderate | Mathematics |
| Apr 4 Shift 1 | Session 2 | Moderate (Easiest of Session 2) | Mathematics |
| Apr 4 Shift 2 | Session 2 | Moderate | Mathematics |
| Apr 5 Shift 1 | Session 2 | Moderate | Mathematics |
| Apr 5 Shift 2 | Session 2 | Moderate | Mathematics |
| Apr 6 Shift 1 | Session 2 | Moderate to Tough (Toughest of Session 2) | Mathematics |
| Apr 6 Shift 2 | Session 2 | Moderate | Mathematics |
| Apr 8 Shift 2 | Session 2 | Moderate | Mathematics |
There is no change in the exam pattern between Session 1 and Session 2. Both follow the identical structure set by NTA.

| Parameter | Session 1 | Session 2 |
| Total Questions | 90 (attempt 75) | 90 (attempt 75) |
| Section A (MCQ) | 20 per subject | 20 per subject |
| Section B (Numerical) | 10 per subject, attempt 5 | 10 per subject, attempt 5 |
| Total Marks | 300 | 300 |
| Marking — Correct | +4 | +4 |
| Marking — Wrong MCQ | –1 | –1 |
| Marking — Wrong Numerical | 0 | 0 |
| Duration | 3 hours | 3 hours |
| Mode | Computer Based Test | Computer Based Test |
| Subjects | Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics | Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics |
The identical pattern means the same strategy works for both sessions. No adjustment is needed in approach if you appeared in Session 1 and are planning for Session 2 in the next cycle.
NTA's rule: If a candidate appears in both sessions, only the higher total NTA percentile score from either session is used to determine the final All India Rank. Scores are not averaged. The lower session score is simply ignored.

JEE

NEET

Foundation JEE

Foundation NEET

CBSE
What this means in practice:
Two critical rules most students miss:
Since JEE Main is conducted across multiple shifts with different question sets, raw marks alone cannot be compared fairly. NTA uses a normalization process to convert raw marks into NTA percentile scores.
How normalization works:

Your percentile in a shift tells you what percentage of candidates in that same shift scored equal to or below you. A student who scores 180 marks in a tougher shift may get a higher percentile than a student who scores 190 in an easier shift — because fewer candidates in the tougher shift crossed 180.
What this means for the Session 1 vs Session 2 comparison:
Practical implication: Do not chase raw marks. Chase accuracy and good attempts. A student with 55 correct answers and 5 wrong answers often outperforms a student with 65 correct answers and 20 wrong answers — both in raw score and in normalization outcome.
The table below compares approximate score-to-percentile mapping across both sessions, based on difficulty trends and normalization patterns.
| Percentile | Approx. Score in Session 1 | Approx. Score in Session 2 |
| 99.5+ | 260–280 | 255–275 |
| 99.0–99.5 | 235–260 | 230–255 |
| 98.0–99.0 | 205–234 | 200–229 |
| 95.0–98.0 | 175–204 | 170–199 |
| 90.0–95.0 | 145–174 | 140–169 |
| 85.0–90.0 | 115–144 | 110–139 |
Key observation: Session 2 being marginally easier means the marks required for the same percentile are slightly higher in Session 2 than in Session 1. Normalization adjusts this at the shift level, but the overall pool difference can affect the session-level cutoff. For most practical purposes, the difference is 5–10 marks at any given percentile band.
Recommended: Appear for both sessions.
Session 1 in January serves as a genuine attempt combined with a real-exam experience. Even if board exam pressure limits your preparation, Session 1 gives you a baseline score that is protected under the Best of Two rule. Session 2 in April — after boards are done — gives you a full preparation window with no competing pressure.
Key advantage for Class 12 students in Session 1: Competition pool is smaller in January. First-time aspirants, droppers who skipped January, and students still completing boards are absent. A smaller pool increases the chance of a higher percentile for the same marks.
Recommended: Appear for both sessions. Prioritise Session 1 seriously.
Droppers typically have the most complete preparation by January, since they have no board exam conflict. This makes Session 1 the optimal attempt for droppers. Appearing seriously in Session 1 gives droppers the best chance at qualifying for JEE Advanced early, with Session 2 as a backup booster.
A common dropper mistake: Treating Session 1 as a rehearsal and targeting Session 2 as the "real" attempt. This wastes the competitive advantage that droppers have in January — a smaller pool and complete preparation.
If your Session 1 percentile is already above the JEE Advanced cutoff (approximately 93–95 percentile for General category) and you are targeting IIT, you have two options:
Appear in Session 2 without exception. The Best of Two rule means there is zero downside risk. A lower Session 2 score simply gets ignored. The only scenario where Session 2 can hurt you is if you use preparation time for Session 2 instead of JEE Advanced — but that is a time management decision, not an NTA policy issue.
One of the least discussed but most important differences between the two sessions is the total number of candidates.
Why this matters: Percentile is a relative measure. The same raw score can yield different percentiles in Session 1 and Session 2 based solely on who else appeared and how they performed — independent of normalization.
Historical trend: 60–70% of students who appear in both sessions have reported a higher percentile in Session 2 compared to Session 1, primarily because boards are done, preparation is more complete, and the first-attempt exam experience reduces anxiety.
| Category | Shift | Reason |
| Toughest overall (both sessions) | January 23, Shift 2 | Chemistry was unusually difficult, rated above Session 2 average |
| Toughest in Session 2 | April 6, Shift 1 | Lengthiest Maths paper of the April session; Chemistry also moderate-tough |
| Easiest in Session 1 | January 28, Shift 2 | Physics was easy, Maths was doable; student-friendly last day paper |
| Easiest in Session 2 | April 4, Shift 1 | Most balanced paper; all sections moderate; highest good attempt count |
From Session 1 students:
From Session 2 students:
Common pattern across both sessions: Students consistently found Mathematics the most time-consuming section and Chemistry the most scoring. No shift in either session reversed this pattern.
Yes — and the reason is simple. The Best of Two rule means appearing in Session 2 carries zero risk to your Session 1 score. NTA only picks your higher percentile. A worse Session 2 performance is completely ignored.
The only meaningful cost of appearing in both sessions is the 2–3 weeks of preparation time invested in Session 2 that could have gone to JEE Advanced. For students with ranks above the JEE Advanced cutoff, this is the one real trade-off to evaluate.
For everyone else, the strategic answer is clear:
Also Check:
No courses found
Based on complete shift-wise data, Session 2 was marginally easier overall, with no shift rated "difficult" compared to one session 1 shift rated moderate-to-difficult. However, normalization accounts for difficulty differences, so the session you perform best in is more important than which one was technically easier.
NTA uses the Best of Two rule — whichever session gave you the higher total NTA percentile score is used for your final All India Rank. If Session 1 gave you a higher percentile, that is used. If Session 2 was better, that is used. Scores are not averaged, and you cannot mix subject scores across sessions.
No. If Session 2 gives you a lower percentile than Session 1, NTA simply ignores Session 2. Your Session 1 score is retained. Appearing in Session 2 carries zero downside risk under the current NTA policy.
No. The pattern is identical in both sessions — 90 questions (75 to attempt), 300 marks, same marking scheme, same three subjects. No changes were made between Session 1 and Session 2 in 2026.
The toughest shift across both sessions was January 23 Shift 2, which was rated moderate-to-difficult with Chemistry being unusually tough. Within Session 2, April 6 Shift 1 was the toughest, rated moderate-to-tough with the lengthiest Mathematics paper of the April session.
Both — but prioritise Session 1 seriously. Droppers have the most complete preparation in January and face a smaller competition pool. Treating Session 1 as a rehearsal wastes the competitive advantage droppers carry into the January attempt.
Normalization is calculated separately within each session. NTA converts your raw marks into a percentile relative to all candidates in your specific shift. After both sessions conclude, the best percentile from each candidate's two attempts is used to prepare the final merit list.
Session 2 typically has a larger pool because it includes Session 1 candidates seeking improvement plus fresh registrants. A higher total candidate count means the percentile calculation is based on more data points, which can slightly affect how marks map to percentile compared to Session 1.
Based on 2026 difficulty and normalization trends, approximately 230–260 marks are needed for 99 percentile in Session 1, and 225–255 marks in Session 2. Session 2 being marginally easier means the raw score bar is slightly higher for the same percentile, though normalization reduces this gap at the shift level.
Download your Session 2 scorecard when results drop on April 20–25, 2026. Compare with your Session 1 percentile — NTA will automatically use the higher one. If your best percentile puts you in the top 2,50,000, register for JEE Advanced 2026 (exam: May 17, 2026) before the registration window closes. For all other options, check the JEE Main 2026 What Next guide.