Courses

By rohit.pandey1
|
Updated on 20 Jul 2026, 15:50 IST
Real Numbers Class 10 notes cover prime factorisation, the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, HCF and LCM applications, and proofs that √2, √3 and √5 are irrational. These CBSE and NCERT-aligned revision notes also include solved examples, important questions, MCQs, competency-based questions and older syllabus topics clearly marked for reference.
These notes are based on CBSE Class 10 Maths Syllabus, classification of real numbers, prime factorisation, HCF and LCM applications, irrationality proofs, solved examples, competency-based questions, revision plans and frequently asked questions.
The CBSE 2026–27 Real Numbers syllabus includes the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic and algebraic proofs of the irrationality of √2, √3 and √5.
Students should be able to:
The current NCERT chapter contains four principal sections:
| Topic | 2026–27 status | Treatment in these notes |
| Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic | Core syllabus | Covered completely |
| Prime factorisation | Core supporting concept | Covered completely |
| Proofs for √2, √3 and √5 | Core syllabus | Covered completely |
| Algebraic irrationality proofs | Current application | Covered with examples |
| HCF and LCM through prime factors | Supporting application | Covered with examples |
| Euclid’s Division Lemma and Algorithm | Not listed as core outcomes | Older-topic appendix only |
| Terminating-decimal test | Not listed as a core outcome | Older-topic appendix only |
A school may assign additional material for an internal examination. For CBSE board preparation, prioritise the concepts explicitly listed in the current official curriculum.
Loading PDF...
The central Real Numbers concepts are shared by Mathematics Basic and Standard, but CBSE publishes separate question-paper designs for the two subjects.
Mathematics Basic generally emphasises direct applications. Mathematics Standard can require more multi-step reasoning and proof analysis. Students should follow the practice set matching their registered subject code.
Real numbers are all rational and irrational numbers together, and every real number corresponds to a point on the number line.
Examples of real numbers include:

An imaginary number such as √−1 is not a real number.
Natural numbers (N): The counting numbers 1, 2, 3, …

JEE

NEET

Foundation JEE

Foundation NEET

CBSE
Whole numbers (W): Natural numbers together with zero: 0, 1, 2, 3, …
Integers (Z): Negative integers, zero and positive integers:
…, −3, −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, 3, …
Rational numbers (Q): Numbers that can be written as p/q, where p and q are integers and q ≠ 0.

Irrational numbers: Real numbers that cannot be written as p/q.
Real numbers (R): Rational and irrational numbers considered together.
The main relationship is:
N ⊂ W ⊂ Z ⊂ Q ⊂ R
Every natural number is a whole number, every whole number is an integer, every integer is rational, and every rational number is real. The reverse of each statement is not always true.
Real numbers
| Property | Rational number | Irrational number |
| Can be written as p/q | Yes | No |
| Decimal form | Terminates or repeats | Neither terminates nor repeats |
| Example | 3/4 = 0.75 | √2 = 1.4142… |
| Part of the real numbers | Yes | Yes |
Every square root is irrational: False. √2 is irrational, but √4 = 2 is rational.
Every non-terminating decimal is irrational: False. A repeating decimal such as 0.333… = 1/3 is rational.
π is equal to 22/7: False. The fraction 22/7 is a rational approximation to π.
Two irrational numbers always produce an irrational result: False. For example:
√2 + (−√2) = 0
and:
√2 × √2 = 2
The Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic states that every composite number has a unique prime factorisation, apart from the order of its prime factors.
For example:
60 = 2 × 2 × 3 × 5
Using powers:
60 = 2² × 3 × 5
Writing the factors in another order does not create a different prime factorisation. The prime factors and their powers remain unchanged.
Prime number: A natural number greater than 1 with exactly two positive factors—1 and itself.
Examples: 2, 3, 5, 7 and 11.
Composite number: A natural number greater than 1 with more than two positive factors.
Examples: 4, 6, 8, 9 and 10.
Coprime numbers: Two positive integers whose HCF is 1.
For example, 8 and 15 are coprime even though neither number is prime.
Prime factorisation: Expressing a composite number as a product of prime numbers.
The number 1 is neither prime nor composite because it has only one positive factor.
Use repeated division or a factor tree until every remaining factor is prime.
Example: Find the prime factorisation of 420.
420 = 2 × 2 × 3 × 5 × 7
420 = 2² × 3 × 5 × 7
Check:
4 × 3 × 5 × 7 = 420
| Error | Correction |
| Including 1 as a prime factor | Begin with 2, the smallest prime |
| Stopping at a composite factor | Continue until every factor is prime |
| Omitting a repeated factor | Count every occurrence before using exponents |
| Writing 2 × 2 as 2³ | Two factors of 2 equal 2² |
| Not checking the answer | Multiply the prime factors to recover the original number |
Find the prime factorisation of 84.
Answer: 84 = 2² × 3 × 7
Find the prime factorisation of 540.
Answer: 540 = 2² × 3³ × 5
A student writes 72 = 2² × 3². Identify the missing factor.
Answer: The correct factorisation is 72 = 2³ × 3², so one factor of 2 is missing.
Explain why 5 × 14 is not the prime factorisation of 70.
Answer: Fourteen is composite. Since 14 = 2 × 7, the prime factorisation is:
70 = 2 × 5 × 7
HCF is found using the lowest powers of common prime factors, while LCM is found using the highest powers of all prime factors present.
Find the HCF of 72 and 120.
Prime-factorise each number:
72 = 2³ × 3²
120 = 2³ × 3 × 5
The common prime factors are 2 and 3.
Select their lowest powers:
HCF = 2³ × 3
HCF = 8 × 3
HCF = 24
Therefore:
HCF(72, 120) = 24
Using the same numbers:
72 = 2³ × 3²
120 = 2³ × 3 × 5
Select the highest power of every prime present:
LCM = 2³ × 3² × 5
LCM = 8 × 9 × 5
LCM = 360
Therefore:
LCM(72, 120) = 360
| Situation | Use |
| Greatest possible equal group size | HCF |
| Largest length measuring every quantity exactly | HCF |
| Smallest common multiple | LCM |
| Repeating events occurring together again | LCM |
| Greatest number dividing all given numbers exactly | HCF |
These clues are helpful, but the mathematical relationship in the problem should determine the method.
For two positive integers a and b:
HCF(a, b) × LCM(a, b) = a × b
Check the relationship for 72 and 120:
24 × 360 = 8,640
72 × 120 = 8,640
The two products are equal.
Do not apply this simple formula directly to three or more numbers.
The HCF of two positive integers is 6, their LCM is 180, and one number is 30. Find the other number.
Let the unknown number be x.
HCF × LCM = Product of the two numbers
6 × 180 = 30x
1,080 = 30x
x = 36
Therefore, the other number is 36.
Check:
HCF(30, 36) = 6
LCM(30, 36) = 180
A teacher has 48 red counters and 72 blue counters. She wants to form the greatest possible number of identical groups without leaving any counter unused.
Prime-factorise the quantities:
48 = 2⁴ × 3
72 = 2³ × 3²
HCF = 2³ × 3
HCF = 24
The teacher can make 24 identical groups.
Each group contains:
48 ÷ 24 = 2 red counters
72 ÷ 24 = 3 blue counters
An irrational number is a real number that cannot be written as p/q, where p and q are integers and q ≠ 0.
The decimal expansion of an irrational number neither terminates nor repeats. Examples include:
A decimal approximation does not prove irrationality. The Class 10 proofs use algebra and contradiction.
Proof by contradiction assumes that the statement to be proved is false and then shows that the assumption creates an impossibility.
To prove that a number is irrational:
Every rational number can be written as a fraction in lowest terms. Therefore, an irrationality proof may assume that p and q have no common factor other than 1.
The proof then shows that the same prime divides both p and q. This contradicts the lowest-term assumption.
If a prime number divides p², then it divides p.
The condition that the divisor is prime matters. The same inference cannot be applied carelessly to a composite number.
To prove that √2 is irrational, assume it is a rational fraction in lowest terms and show that its numerator and denominator must both be even.
Assume, for contradiction, that:
√2 = p/q
Here, p and q are coprime integers and q ≠ 0.
Square both sides:
2 = p²/q²
Therefore:
p² = 2q² … (1)
Equation (1) shows that p² is divisible by 2. Since 2 is prime, p is also divisible by 2.
Let:
p = 2k
Substitute p = 2k into Equation (1):
(2k)² = 2q²
4k² = 2q²
q² = 2k²
Therefore, q is also divisible by 2.
Both p and q are divisible by 2. This contradicts the assumption that p and q are coprime.
Therefore:
√2 is irrational.
| Proof step | Purpose |
| Assume √2 = p/q | Begin the contradiction |
| State that p and q are coprime | Put the fraction in lowest terms |
| Derive p² = 2q² | Establish divisibility |
| Show that 2 divides p | Use prime divisibility |
| Substitute p = 2k | Show that 2 also divides q |
| Identify the common factor | Contradict coprimality |
| Reject the assumption | Complete the proof |
The proofs for √3 and √5 use the same contradiction structure as the proof for √2.
Assume:
√3 = p/q
Here, p and q are coprime integers and q ≠ 0.
Squaring gives:
p² = 3q²
Therefore, 3 divides p². Since 3 is prime, 3 divides p.
Let:
p = 3k
Substitute:
9k² = 3q²
q² = 3k²
Therefore, 3 also divides q.
Both p and q are divisible by 3. This contradicts the assumption that they are coprime.
Therefore:
√3 is irrational.
Assume:
√5 = p/q
Here, p and q are coprime integers and q ≠ 0.
Squaring gives:
p² = 5q²
Therefore, 5 divides p.
Let:
p = 5k
Substitute:
25k² = 5q²
q² = 5k²
Therefore, 5 also divides q.
Both p and q are divisible by 5, contradicting the coprime condition.
Therefore:
√5 is irrational.
For a prime number r:
The method does not prove that √4 is irrational because √4 = 2, and 4 is not prime.
A false argument may claim:
If 4 divides p², then 4 divides p.
This is not always true. If p = 2, then 4 divides p² because p² = 4, but 4 does not divide p.
The valid theorem used in the prescribed proofs concerns a prime divisor. Four is composite.
An expression containing a known irrational number can often be proved irrational by assuming the entire expression is rational and isolating the irrational part.
If r is rational and x is irrational, then r + x is irrational.
If r + x were rational, subtracting r would make x rational. This contradicts the assumption that x is irrational.
If r is a non-zero rational number and x is irrational, then rx is irrational.
If rx were rational, dividing by r would make x rational.
Assume:
3 + 2√5 = r
Here, r is rational.
Then:
2√5 = r − 3
√5 = (r − 3)/2
The right-hand side is rational. This would make √5 rational, which is a contradiction.
Therefore:
3 + 2√5 is irrational.
Assume:
7√5 = r
Here, r is rational.
Dividing by 7:
√5 = r/7
This would make √5 rational, producing a contradiction.
Therefore:
7√5 is irrational.
Assume:
6 + √2 = r
Here, r is rational.
Then:
√2 = r − 6
The right-hand side is rational. This contradicts the known irrationality of √2.
Therefore:
6 + √2 is irrational.
| Statement | Always true? | Example or explanation |
| Rational + irrational is irrational | Yes | Otherwise subtraction would make the irrational term rational |
| Non-zero rational × irrational is irrational | Yes | Otherwise division would make the irrational term rational |
| Irrational + irrational is irrational | No | √2 + (−√2) = 0 |
| Irrational − irrational is irrational | No | √3 − √3 = 0 |
| Irrational × irrational is irrational | No | √2 × √2 = 2 |
| Irrational ÷ irrational is irrational | No | √5 ÷ √5 = 1 |
These examples cover classification, prime factorisation, HCF and LCM reasoning, and algebraic irrationality proofs.
| Number | Classification |
| 5 | Natural, whole, integer, rational and real |
| −3/4 | Rational and real |
| √9 = 3 | Natural, whole, integer, rational and real |
| √7 | Irrational and real |
| π | Irrational and real |
756 = 2 × 378
756 = 2 × 2 × 189
756 = 2² × 3 × 63
756 = 2² × 3 × 3 × 21
756 = 2² × 3³ × 7
Therefore:
756 = 2² × 3³ × 7
Find the HCF and LCM of 90 and 168.
90 = 2 × 3² × 5
168 = 2³ × 3 × 7
For the HCF, select the lowest powers of common primes:
HCF = 2 × 3 = 6
For the LCM, select the highest powers of all primes:
LCM = 2³ × 3² × 5 × 7
LCM = 2,520
Check:
6 × 2,520 = 15,120
90 × 168 = 15,120
A student writes:
“√6 = p/q, so p² = 6q². Therefore, 6 divides p.”
The conclusion has not yet been justified because 6 is composite.
The student must use the prime factors 2 and 3 separately. Since both 2 and 3 divide p², both divide p. Only then can the student conclude that 6 divides p.
Claim: The sum of two irrational numbers is always irrational.
Counterexample:
√2 + (−√2) = 0
Both terms are irrational, but zero is rational. Therefore, the claim is false.
Competency-based questions test whether students can interpret, apply and justify mathematical ideas rather than only recall definitions.
CBSE’s 2026–27 secondary curriculum states that approximately 50% of questions are competency-focused. These can include case-based, source-based, integrated and data-interpretation questions.
Which number is irrational?
0.125
B. 7/9
C. √49
D. √11
Answer: D. √11 is irrational.
The prime factorisation of 360 is:
A. 2² × 3² × 5
B. 2³ × 3² × 5
C. 2³ × 3 × 5²
D. 2² × 3³ × 5
Answer: B. 360 = 2³ × 3² × 5.
If HCF(a, b) = 12, LCM(a, b) = 420 and a = 60, find b.
b = (12 × 420)/60
b = 84
Answer: 84.
Assertion: 3 + √2 is irrational.
Reason: The sum of a rational number and an irrational number is irrational.
Answer: Both statements are true, and the reason correctly explains the assertion.
A student writes:
“Let √5 = p/q. We get p² = 5q², so both are divisible by 5. This is a contradiction.”
Two steps are missing:
A school has 96 Mathematics Basic worksheets and 144 Mathematics Standard worksheets. The worksheets must be packed into the greatest possible number of identical sets.
96 = 2⁵ × 3
144 = 2⁴ × 3²
HCF = 2⁴ × 3
HCF = 48
The school can make 48 identical sets.
Each set contains:
96 ÷ 48 = 2 Basic worksheets
144 ÷ 48 = 3 Standard worksheets
Mathematics Basic and Standard share the central Real Numbers concepts, but students should practise at the level appropriate to their registered paper.
For Question 4, the proposed pair cannot exist because the HCF must divide the LCM, but 18 does not divide 280.
The most common errors involve outdated syllabus material, incomplete prime factorisation and missing logical steps in irrationality proofs.
| Mistake | Correct approach |
| Treating every radical as irrational | Simplify first; √9 = 3 |
| Writing 22/7 = π | Treat 22/7 as an approximation |
| Calling 1 a prime number | One is neither prime nor composite |
| Stopping factorisation at a composite number | Continue until every factor is prime |
| Using the highest powers for HCF | HCF uses the lowest common powers |
| Using the lowest powers for LCM | LCM uses the highest required powers |
| Applying HCF × LCM = ab to three numbers | Use the simple formula only for two positive integers |
| Omitting the coprime condition | State that p/q is in lowest terms |
| Showing only that the prime divides p | Substitute and prove that it also divides q |
| Treating every old PYQ as current | Check it against the 2026–27 syllabus |
A 30-minute revision should cover the current syllabus, one complete proof and a short self-test.
A one-day revision should combine concept review, written proof practice and self-testing.
NCERT provides the essential concepts and exercises, but students should also practise current-syllabus competency and reasoning questions.
Use this sequence:
Real Numbers Chapter 1 for CBSE 2026–27 centres on unique prime factorisation and algebraic proofs of irrationality.
This ten-question diagnostic checks the central Real Numbers concepts.
No courses found
Real numbers are rational and irrational numbers together. Every real number corresponds to a point on the number line.
The current syllabus lists the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic and algebraic proofs showing that √2, √3 and √5 are irrational.
It is not listed as a core Real Numbers outcome in the CBSE 2026–27 curriculum. Study it as additional material only if your school requires it.
It is not identified as a core 2026–27 outcome. Prioritise prime factorisation, the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic and irrationality proofs.
The terminating-decimal test is not listed as a core outcome in the current syllabus. It appears frequently in older notes, so verify the status of each question.
Every composite number can be expressed as a product of primes, and the factorisation is unique apart from factor order.
Assume √2 = p/q in lowest terms, then use p² = 2q² to show that both p and q are even. This contradicts their coprimality.
A rational number can always be expressed in lowest terms. Proving that p and q share a factor then creates the required contradiction.
The proof for √2 uses the fact that 2 is prime. Four is composite, and √4 = 2 is rational.
Review the theorem and definitions, write one complete irrationality proof, solve one application, and finish with the diagnostic test.
NCERT is the essential starting point, but students should also practise current competency-based, proof-completion and reasoning questions.
CBSE does not guarantee a fixed chapter-wise allocation in its curriculum. Use the latest official sample paper instead of an unofficial expected-weightage claim.
The central concepts are shared, but Mathematics Basic and Standard have separate paper designs and can test the material at different levels of complexity.